Appeal No. 1999-1280 Application No. 08/379,813 We affirm the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102, and reverse the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph and § 103. DISCUSSION In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered appellants’ specification and claims, in addition to the respective positions articulated by the appellants and the examiner. We make reference to the examiner’s Answer2, and Supplemental Answer3 for the examiner’s reasoning in support of the rejection. We further reference appellants’ Brief4, Reply Brief5 and Supplemental Reply Brief6 for the appellants’ arguments in favor of patentability. We note the examiner entered and considered appellants’ Supplemental Reply Brief without comment.7 Background The invention relates generally to the periodontia, the tissues immediately about the teeth. Periodontal disease results in a loss of connective tissue attachment to the tooth and loss of alveolar bone (specification, page 1). Periodontal lesions can affect the alveolar bone, the tissue apparatus which attaches tooth to bone, and/or furcation or interproximal tissue (specification, page 3). The lesions can affect the mandible or 2 Paper No. 19, mailed October 8, 1997. 3 Paper No. 21, mailed November 25, 1997. 4 Paper No. 18, received August 12, 1997. 5 Paper No. 20, received November 10, 1997. 6 Paper No. 22, received December 22, 1997. 7 Paper No. 23, mailed February 2, 1998. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007