Ex Parte WOZNEY et al - Page 12




             Appeal No.  1999-1280                                                                              
             Application No.  08/379,813                                                                        

             examiner has not met his burden9 of presenting the evidence necessary to establish a               
             prima facie case of obviousness.  If the examiner fails to establish a prima facie case,           
             the rejection is improper and will be overturned.  In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071, 1074, 5              
             USPQ2d 1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988).                                                                
                   Accordingly, we reverse the examiner=s rejection of claims 1-33 under 35 U.S.C.              
             § 103 over Bentz.                                                                                  
























                                                                                                               
             9 See In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445 (Fed. Cir. 1992)  (the initial burden of                  
             establishing unpatentability rests on the examiner).                                               
                                                      12                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007