Ex parte KATUS et al. - Page 4


            Appeal No. 1997-0798                                                                         
            Application 08/128,020                                                                       
            infarction.  Specification, page 3.  Thus, use of troponin I as a marker for the occurrence  
            of an infarct is problematic.                                                                
                  As explained at page 4 line 21- page 5 line 7 of the specification:                    
                        Surprisingly, it turned out that a significantly higher sensitivity can be       
                        obtained by a troponin T immunoassay in the determination of myocardial          
                        necroses (such as e.g. by cardiac infarction, ischaemia or angina pectoris)      
                        than by the determination of other parameters such as CK, CK-MB, GOT,            
                        LDH or troponin I.  As established by the inventors the reason for this is       
                        that in contrast to other proteins of the contractile apparatus no serum         
                        concentration can be measured for troponin T up to the detection limit of        
                        the test (0.25 ng/ml) in normal patients (who have not suffered myocardial       
                        necroses).                                                                       
                        This is particularly surprising since, because of the functional relationship    
                        between the troponins, a similar serum concentration to that for troponin I      
                        would be expected for troponin T.  Furthermore, the serum concentration          
                        curve of troponin T differs significantly, for example in a transmural           
                        infarction, from the curve for troponin I.  In contrast to troponin I the curve  
                        of the time course is in three phases instead of two phases and troponin T       
                        is found to be increased on average for up to 300 hours after the onset of       
                        pain.  The time interval for absolute diagnostic sensitivity lasts from the 6th  
                        to the 195th hour.  The time interval for the absolute diagnostic sensitivity    
                        is thus nearly four times as long as that known for troponin I.                  
            Appellants’ invention involves the use of an antibody to troponin T as a means to            
            diagnose and monitor myocardial necroses in a patient.  Troponin exists in human             
            skeletal muscle as well as human cardiac muscle.  Thus, in order to monitor myocardial       
            necroses it is important that an a ntibody be able to differentiate between the two          
            proteins.  As the claims now read, all claims require the use of at least one antibody to    
            human cardiac muscle troponin T having cross-reactivity to human skeletal muscle             
            troponin T which is less than 5% as determined by ELISA and cross-reactivity to              
            troponin I and other myofibrillar proteins of less than 2% as determined by ELISA.           





                                                   4                                                     



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007