Ex parte KATUS et al. - Page 6


            Appeal No. 1997-0798                                                                         
            Application 08/128,020                                                                       
                  The examiner’s position is summarized in the paragraph bridging pages 4-5 of           
            the Examiner’s Answer as follows:                                                            
                        It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to select one    
                        of the troponins as a marker for diagnosis of myocardial infarction, since       
                        Cummins et al. specifically teach that any of the contractile proteins of the    
                        myofibril could meet the requirements for a suitable cardiodiagnostic            
                        marker, and that the troponin complex proteins in particular would be            
                        desirable since they are single polypeptides and display a relatively simple     
                        tissue isotype distribution when compared to either myosin or tropomyosin        
                        isotypes.  One of ordinary skill in the art would not have utilized troponin-    
                        C, since Gahlmann et al. specifically teaches that the cardiac form of           
                        troponin-C is also expressed in skeletal muscle and in certain fibroblasts.      
                        One of ordinary skill in the art would have expected success in raising          
                        antibodies to troponin-T, since Lim et al. were successful in raising a          
                        monoclonal antibody which was specific for troponin-T.  Although the             
                        antibody of Lim et al. did crossreact with both the skeletal and cardiac         
                        forms, one of ordinary skill in the art would have expected success in           
                        producing a cardiac specific antibody, since Sevier et al. specifically          
                        teaches that “unwanted” reactivity may be eliminated from consideration in       
                        the production of monoclonal antibodies by merely selecting against              
                        antibodies responsible for such cross reacti vity during the screening           
                        phase and Leszyk et al. specifically teach that cardiac troponin-T has an        
                        extended amino terminus that is rich in glutamic acid, so that cardiac           
                        troponin-Ts are acidic, while skeletal TnTs are basic.                           

                  Viewing the references relied upon by the examiner apart from appellants’              
            disclosure of the present invention, as we must, we do not find that the references          
            would have reasonably suggested the claimed subject matter.  For example, no                 
            reference directly suggests the use of troponin T as a marker for myocardial necroses.       
            Even if one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to use troponin T as a  
            marker for myocardial necroses, the references at best suggest that antibodies might be      
            developed which could distinguish between cardiac muscle troponin T and human                
            skeletal muscle troponin T.  The fact that the two proteins have different amino acid        
            sequences only creates the possibility that antibodies could be formed which would           


                                                   6                                                     



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007