Appeal No. 1997-0798 Application 08/128,020 The examiner’s position is summarized in the paragraph bridging pages 4-5 of the Examiner’s Answer as follows: It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to select one of the troponins as a marker for diagnosis of myocardial infarction, since Cummins et al. specifically teach that any of the contractile proteins of the myofibril could meet the requirements for a suitable cardiodiagnostic marker, and that the troponin complex proteins in particular would be desirable since they are single polypeptides and display a relatively simple tissue isotype distribution when compared to either myosin or tropomyosin isotypes. One of ordinary skill in the art would not have utilized troponin- C, since Gahlmann et al. specifically teaches that the cardiac form of troponin-C is also expressed in skeletal muscle and in certain fibroblasts. One of ordinary skill in the art would have expected success in raising antibodies to troponin-T, since Lim et al. were successful in raising a monoclonal antibody which was specific for troponin-T. Although the antibody of Lim et al. did crossreact with both the skeletal and cardiac forms, one of ordinary skill in the art would have expected success in producing a cardiac specific antibody, since Sevier et al. specifically teaches that “unwanted” reactivity may be eliminated from consideration in the production of monoclonal antibodies by merely selecting against antibodies responsible for such cross reacti vity during the screening phase and Leszyk et al. specifically teach that cardiac troponin-T has an extended amino terminus that is rich in glutamic acid, so that cardiac troponin-Ts are acidic, while skeletal TnTs are basic. Viewing the references relied upon by the examiner apart from appellants’ disclosure of the present invention, as we must, we do not find that the references would have reasonably suggested the claimed subject matter. For example, no reference directly suggests the use of troponin T as a marker for myocardial necroses. Even if one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to use troponin T as a marker for myocardial necroses, the references at best suggest that antibodies might be developed which could distinguish between cardiac muscle troponin T and human skeletal muscle troponin T. The fact that the two proteins have different amino acid sequences only creates the possibility that antibodies could be formed which would 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007