Ex parte VALLE et al - Page 3




             Appeal No.  1999-1417                                                                                    
             Application 08/268,730                                                                                   

                    or esters or amides of the sialic carboxy groups of said N-acyl-lysogangliosides,                 
             inner esters of said N-acyl-lysogangliosides, peracylated derivatives of said N-acyl-                    
             lysogangliosides, metal salts or organic base salts of said N-acyl-lysogangliosides having               
             acid groups, acid addition salts of said N-acyl-lysogangliosides and mixtures of said N-                 
             acyl-lysogangliosides is administered to a patient in need of such treatment.                            


                                                  The References                                                      
                    In rejecting claim 74 on prior art grounds, the examiner relies on the following                  
             reference:                                                                                               
             Schwarzmann et al. (Schwarzmann), “Lysogangliosides: Synthesis and Use in Preparing                      
             Labeled Gangliosides,” Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 138, pp. 319-341 (1987)                               

                    In rejecting claims 76 through 80 on non-prior art grounds, the examiner relies on                
             the following reference:                                                                                 
             Olney, “Excitotoxic Amino Acids and Neuropsychiatric Disorders,” Annu. Rev. Pharmacol.                   
             Toxicol., Vol. 30, pp. 47-71 (1990)                                                                      



                                                     The Issues                                                       
                    The issues presented for review are (1) whether the examiner erred in rejecting                   
             claim 74 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Schwarzmann; and (2) whether the                     



                                                          3                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007