Ex Parte WEICHSELBAUM et al - Page 7


                 Appeal No. 1999-1458                                                                                     
                 Application No. 07/943,812                                                                               
                 substitute one for another need not be present in order to render such                                   
                 substitution obvious.  In re Fout, 675 F.2d 297, 301, 213 USPQ 532, 536 (CCPA                            
                 1982).                                                                                                   
                         According to appellants (Brief, page 9), the examiner ignored their                              
                 unexpected results.  Specifically, appellants argue (Brief, pages 9-10) that                             
                 “[t]here is no teaching or suggestion in the prior art regarding the radiation                           
                 inducibility of the claimed constructs … [t]he examiner has not disputed these                           
                 facts and even admits that the radiation inducibility of the claimed constructs was                      
                 nonobvious.”  To this the examiner argues (Answer, page 9), “[t]here is no                               
                 evidence of unexpected results.  Radiation inducibility is a previously unknown                          
                 property of the jun and Egr-1 promoters, not an unexpected result of combining                           
                 the promoters with any coding sequence other than CAT.”  Once again, on the                              
                 surface, there is some merit to the examiner’s argument.  As set forth in In re                          
                 Dillon, 919 F.2d 688, 693, 16 USPQ2d 1897, 1901 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (en banc):                              
                         There is no question that all evidence of the properties of the                                  
                         claimed compositions and the prior art must be considered in                                     
                         determining the ultimate question of patentability, but it is also clear                         
                         that the discovery that a claimed composition possesses a property                               
                         not disclosed for the prior art subject matter, does not by itself                               
                         defeat a prima facie case.  … [In re Shetty, 566 F.2d 81, 86, 195                                
                         USPQ 753, 756 (CCPA 1977)].  Each situation must be considered                                   
                         on its own facts, but it is not necessary in order to establish a prima                          
                         facie case of obviousness that both a structural similarity between                              
                         a claimed and prior art compound (or a key component of a                                        
                         composition) be shown and that there be a suggestion in or                                       
                         expectation from the prior art that the claimed compound or                                      
                         composition will have the same or a similar utility as one newly                                 
                         discovered by applicant.                                                                         
                 In In re Shetty, 566 F.2d 81, 86, 195 USPQ 753, 756 (CCPA 1977), the court                               
                 found that:                                                                                              

                                                            7                                                             



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007