The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is
not binding precedent of the Board
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte YI-SHUNG CHAUG,
THOMAS A. CARROLL, MARK SYNDER,
and R. SCOTT WINSLOW
______________
Appeal No. 1999-1539
Application 08/584,118
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, LALL and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 9, 13 and 14.
Claims 10 to 12 have been canceled.1
1Applicants’ amendment filed March 31, 1998, canceling
claims 10-12, should be formally entered, in accordance with
the indication in Part 3 of the Advisory Action mailed April
(continued...)
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007