Appeal No. 1999-1539
Application 08/584,118
In conclusion, we reverse the decision of the examiner
rejecting under 35 U.S.C. § 102 claims 1 to 9, 13 and 14 as
being anticipated by Sundaram; and claims 1 to 3 as being
anticipated by Canon. We also reverse the decision of the
examiner rejecting under 35 U.S.C. § 103 claims 4 to 9, 13 and
14 as being obvious over Canon in view of Sundaram.
REVERSED
Jerry Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Parshotam S. Lall ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Howard B. Blankenship )
Administrative Patent Judge )
PSL/jg
Timothy R. Schulte
Storage Technology Corporation
2270 South 77th St, MS-4309
Louisville, CO 80028-4309
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: November 3, 2007