Appeal No. 1999-1574
Application No. 08/321,324
the selection electrode being on the same plane, as
interpreted in regard to claim 1. Therefore, for the same
rationale, we do not sustain the anticipation rejection of
claim 11 by Kitamura. Since claims 2 to 3, 7 to 10, 12, 13,
and 17 to 19 are dependent
on the independent claims 1 and 11, they also contain the same
limitations, and therefore, the anticipation rejection of
these claims by Kitamura is also not sustained.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007