The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YOSHIHIRO HAGIWARA, RYOSUKE UEMATSU, JUNICHI SUETSUGU, HITOSHI MINEMOTO, and KAZUO SHIMA ____________ Appeal No. 1999-1652 Application No. 08/758,369 ____________ HEARD: August 16, 2001 ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 1-4. We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal is an ink jet recording head for ejecting liquid ink having charged toner particles therein. As shown in Figure 1 of the appellants’ specification, the recording head includes an ink reservoir 3Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007