Ex parte WYATT - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1999-1660                                                        
          Application No. 08/444,242                                                  


          that recording sleep and awake times are "obvious uses of the               
          disclosed method of the patent in view of a variety of                      
          applications of the timer disclosed therein....  The device                 
          and associated method may thus be used in any application                   
          where time measuring is required with                                       
          a hand-held timer."  The examiner continues (Final Rejection,               
          page 3) that                                                                
               use of the device of Forbath is not limited to any                     
               particular mental state of the user.  Thus, the                        
               method may be practiced in the manner disclosed to                     
               measure time periods when the person is awake or                       
               asleep, or engaged in other activity if switch 14 is                   
               actuated previously.  The involuntary action of                        
               falling asleep of the user subsequent to actuation                     
               of the timer switch in Forbath would be within the                     
               ordinary and usual range of choices for such an                        
               individual.  The step of falling asleep as claimed,                    
               therefore, cannot serve to provide any patentable                      
               subject matter to the otherwise known method.                          
               The examiner has essentially disregarded the claimed                   
          method steps and focused solely on the device used to                       
          implement the method.  Since Forbath discloses a timer with a               
          user-activated switch, the examiner concludes that the                      
          remaining claim limitations (i.e., those directed to the                    
          method per se) would have been obvious.                                     
               All of the claims are directed to methods (or processes).              

                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007