Ex parte COWAN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-1756                                                       
          Application No. 08/499,100                                                 


          entry therein.  In light of the examiner's comments on page 3              
          of the answer (Paper No. 19), we presume that the examiner has             
          approved entry of both amendments after final.                             
                                     BACKGROUND                                      
               The appellants' invention relates to seals for an exhaust             
          nozzle with vectoring capabilities that is movable about                   
          multiple axes for a gas turbine engine (specification, p. 1).              
          Claim 1 is exemplary and is reproduced in the appendix to                  
          appellants' first reply brief (Paper No. 20) .1                              
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                 
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                             
          Silverwater                        4,783,271           Nov.  8,            
          1988                                                                       
          Herrick et al. (Herrick)                4,836,451           Jun.           
          6, 1989                                                                    
          Bachovchin et al. (Bachovchin)     5,433,771           Jul. 18,            
          1995                                                                       
                                                  (filed Apr. 25, 1994)              
          Beeman, Jr. (Beeman)               5,480,162           Jan.  2,            
          1996                                                                       
                                                  (filed Sep. 8, 1993)               
               The following rejections are before us for review.                    


               Both the appendix attached to appellants' brief (Paper No. 16) and the1                                                                    
          appendix filed April 20, 1998 (Paper No. 18) contained errors in the       
          reproduction of claim 1.                                                   
                                         2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007