Appeal No. 1999-1756 Application No. 08/499,100 entry therein. In light of the examiner's comments on page 3 of the answer (Paper No. 19), we presume that the examiner has approved entry of both amendments after final. BACKGROUND The appellants' invention relates to seals for an exhaust nozzle with vectoring capabilities that is movable about multiple axes for a gas turbine engine (specification, p. 1). Claim 1 is exemplary and is reproduced in the appendix to appellants' first reply brief (Paper No. 20) .1 The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Silverwater 4,783,271 Nov. 8, 1988 Herrick et al. (Herrick) 4,836,451 Jun. 6, 1989 Bachovchin et al. (Bachovchin) 5,433,771 Jul. 18, 1995 (filed Apr. 25, 1994) Beeman, Jr. (Beeman) 5,480,162 Jan. 2, 1996 (filed Sep. 8, 1993) The following rejections are before us for review. Both the appendix attached to appellants' brief (Paper No. 16) and the1 appendix filed April 20, 1998 (Paper No. 18) contained errors in the reproduction of claim 1. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007