The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte GARY E. LAVELLE and JAMES P. KRUL ______________ Appeal No. 1999-1790 Application 08/707,206 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, KRASS and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 24. Representative claim 1 is reproduced below: 1. An electromagnetic lock comprising: an electromagnet; an armature for bonding engagement to said electromagnet, one of said armature and said electromagnet being adapted for mounting to a door, and the other of said electromagnet and said armature adapted for mounting to a door frame; 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007