Appeal No. 1999-1790 Application 08/707,206 burst of a higher level of electrical energy is applied to move the lock from an open to a locked position." This description is consistent with the operation of Waltz’s power circuit 22 with its enhancing circuit 39 depicted in Figure 1 as discussed in the paragraph bridging columns 2 and 3. These power circuits are further detailed in Figure 7; the most pertinent portion corresponding to it for our purposes is the paragraph bridging columns 5 and 6. On the basis of the nature of the operation of the circuit controlling the electromagnetic lock in Waltz, we cannot conclude that the artisan would have found it obvious to have utilized a pulse width modulation approach as in Oyama to replace the operation of the power actuating circuits in Figures 1 and 7 of Waltz. Waltz’s power circuit operates upon the principle of providing a high current initial pulse derived both from the power supply voltage +V in addition to the initial current supplied by the discharge of the capacitor 234 in Figure 7, both cumulatively providing an initial high current value to actuate the lock and, upon discharge of the capacitor 234, providing a holding current for the coil 242 in Figure 7 supplied only by the +V power supply voltage. Thus, in accordance with the examiner’s views about the deficiencies of Waltz alone meeting the subject matter of the independent claims on appeal, there is no series of pulse-width- 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007