The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DUSIT KRUANGAM
__________
Appeal No. 1999-1891
Application No. 08/421,089
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before LALL, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 4-28. Claims 1-3 1
have been canceled.2
1An amendment after the final rejection was filed as
Paper No. 10. However, the examiner did not approve its
entry, see Paper No. 11.
2See second amendment after the final rejection, Paper
No. 16, which the examiner approved for entry, see examiner’s
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007