The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RAYMOND SENKUS, CHUNG I. YOUNG,
LEONARD W. BARRETT and YING-YUH LU
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-1903
Application No. 08/781,055
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CAROFF, PAK and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection (Paper No. 17) of
claims 1-7 and 11-28. Other claims, i.e., claims 8-10, have been objected to, with the
examiner indicating that they would be allowable if rewritten so as not to depend on a
rejected base claim (Paper No. 15).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007