Ex parte SENKUS et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-1903                                                                                     
              Application No. 08/781,055                                                                               


                     Subsequent to the final rejection, appellants filed a Continued Prosecution                       
              Application Request (Paper No. 20), resulting in the cancellation of withdrawn claims 29-                
              41, and the addition of claims 42-43 (see the amendment filed on April 21, 1998, which                   
              has been entered in the record as Paper No. 18).  Accordingly, the rejected claims now                   
              before us on appeal are claims 1-7, 11-28 and 42-43.                                                     
                     The appealed claims relate to a permeable, composite article including “active”                   
              particulate and pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) polymer microparticulate.                              
                     Appellants acknowledge on page 3 of their brief that all of the rejected claims stand             
              or fall together for purposes of this appeal.   Accordingly, we limit our consideration to               
              claim 1, the sole independent claim, which reads as follows:                                             
                     1.   A permeable, composite structure comprising active particulate bonded                        
                     to each other with pressure-sensitive adhesive polymer microparticulate.                          
                     The references of record relied upon by the examiner are:                                         
                     Braun et al. (Braun)               5,078,132            Jan. 07, 1992                             
                     Young et al. (Young)               5,292,844            Mar. 08, 1994                             
                     Claims 1-7, 11-28 and 42-43 stand rejected for obviousness under 35 U.S.C.     §                  
              103 in view of Braun taken with or without Young.                                                        








                                                          2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007