Ex parte HEGLUND - Page 1




                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                                                      
                                      publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                            
                                                                                                                    Paper No. 24                        
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                      Ex parte WILLIAM HEGLUND                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                          Appeal No. 1999-1941                                                                          
                                                    Application No. 08/629,700                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                 Before FLEMING, LALL, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                         
                 LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     


                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                                                                       
                 the Examiner's final rejection  of claims 1 to 14, which1                                                                                
                 constitute all the claims in the application.                                                                                          
                          The disclosed invention is directed to a control for a                                                                        
                 switched reluctance motor (srm) and includes means for detecting                                                                       
                 magnitude of current flowing in the machine winding and means                                                                          
                 responsive to the detecting means for controlling commutation of                                                                       

                          1An amendment after the final rejection was filed as                                                                          
                 Paper No. 18, however, the Examiner did not approve its entry                                                                          
                 into the record, see Paper No. 19.                                                                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007