Appeal No. 1999-1941 Application No. 08/629,700 Therefore, for the same rationale we cannot sustain the obviousness rejection of claims 6 and 11 and the dependent claims 7 to 10 and 12 to 14, respectively. In conclusion, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1 to 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, over Lyons in view of MacMinn is reversed. REVERSED MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT PARSHOTAM S. LALL ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOSEPH L. DIXON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007