Appeal No. 1999-1992
Application No. 08/848,842
noted above in the rejection of claim 1 by Farwell.
Therefore, we cannot sustain the obviousness rejection of
claim 6 over Farwell and Davis.
In summary, we have not sustained the rejections under
35 U.S.C. § 102 of claims 1-4, 7-9, 12-19 and 22 as being
anticipated by Farwell. Nor have we sustained any of the
rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 5 and 10 over
Farwell and Kolluri, and of claim 6 over Farwell and Davis.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007