The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 32 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOHN I. SHIPP ____________ Appeal No. 1999-2039 Application No. 08/531,424 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, KRASS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from an examiner’s rejection of claims 10-17, 18, and 29-36. We reverse. BACKGROUND The appellant’s light source is mounted in the distal end of an endoscope to illuminate an object within a bodily cavity. A series of four red, fourteen green, and ten blue light-emitting-diodes (LEDs) is mounted and arranged on aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007