Appeal No. 1999-2039 Page 12
Application No. 08/531,424
center of said pattern, said central aperture and said pattern
of light emitting diodes having a central axis coaxially
aligned with a central axis of the optical lens system.”
Therefore, we reverse the rejection of claims 10, 11, 15, 17,
and 19 as being obvious over Kakinuma in view of Pileski, of
claims 29-34 and 36 as being obvious over Kakinuma in view of
Pileski further in view of Nagasaki, of claims 29-34 and 36 as
being obvious over Kakinuma in view of Pileski further in view
of Nagasaki even further in view of Uehara, of claims 12 and
13 as being obvious over Moore in view of Kakinuma further in
view of Pileski, and of claim 14 as being obvious over Moore
in view of Kakinuma further in view of Pileski even further in
view of Nagasaki.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 10-17, 18, and 29-36
under § 103(a) is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007