Appeal No. 1999-2077 Page 7
Application No. 08/589,251
1, lines 28-30), the broad teaching by Lemelson of “any
suitable metal” is insufficient in this instance to teach or
suggest a magnetic material. Therefore, the evidence relied
upon by the examiner in rejecting claims 2 and 11 is
insufficient to establish that the subject matter of these
claims would have been obvious within the meaning of 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a).
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007