Appeal No. 1999-2119
Application No. 08/815,410
for example, the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) at
section 804 and especially at section 804 II. B.2 on pages 804-21
and 804-22 (July 1998).
For these reasons, we will not sustain the examiner’s double
patenting rejection of appealed claims 6-8, 11 and 12 over claims
1-7 of Watanabe ‘112.
Summary
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
Edward C. Kimlin )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Bradley R. Garris ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Romulo H. Delmendo )
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007