Ex parte SINGH et al. - Page 19




          Appeal No. 1999-2131                                      Page 19           
          Application No. 08/971,504                                                  


          inclusion of other materials.6  We do not find any definition               
          for this phrase in the appellants' specification.  The                      
          ordinary usage of "primarily" means "mainly" or "principally".              
          Also, the appellants could have used one of the known closed                
          terms (e.g., "consisting of"), but chose not to do so.  Hence,              
          it is our view that one of ordinary skill in the art, taking                
          the appellants' written description into account, would have                
          understood the phrase "consisting primarily of" to mean that                
          other materials are not excluded.  Specifically, Drake's                    
          aluminide coating is not excluded.                                          


               The only difference between Drake and claim 1 is the                   
          limitation of the thrust bearing element being "formed of a                 
          wrought alloy material consisting primarily of chromium                     
          carbide and cobalt and having a yield strength of less than                 
          120,000 psi and a ductility of at least 4%, both at room                    
          temperature".  The examiner should consider whether, based on               

                                                                                     
          6 During patent examination the pending claims must be interpreted as broadly
          as their terms reasonably allow in order to achieve complete exploration of 
          applicant's invention and its relationship to prior art, so that ambiguities 
          can be recognized, scope and breadth of language explored and clarification 
          imposed.  See In re Zletz, 893 F. 2d 319, 321, 13 USPQ2d 1320, 1322 (Fed.   
          Cir. 1989).                                                                 







Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007