Appeal No. 1999-2248
Application No. 08/960,255
Examiner, reference is made to the Brief, Reply Brief, 2 3
Examiner's Answer, and letter for the respective details4 5
thereof.
OPINION
After careful review of the evidence before us, we will
not sustain the rejection of claims 1, 2 and 7 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as anticipated by Appellants' admitted prior art
figures 13-21, or the rejection of claims 3-6 and 8-9 under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Appellants' admitted prior
art figures 13-21.
A. Rejection of Claims 1, 2 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. §
102(b) as anticipated by Appellants' admitted prior art
figures 13-21.
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1, 2 and 7
2The Brief was received May 10, 1999.
3The Reply Brief was received July 28, 1999.
4The Examiner's Answer was mailed June 4, 1999.
5The Examiner mailed a letter on August 16, 1999, stating
that Appellants' Reply Brief had been entered and considered
but no further response by the Examiner was deemed necessary.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007