Ex parte YIANILOS - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                                 Paper No. 52         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                              Ex parte PETER N. YIANILOS                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-2257                                 
                              Application No. 08/767,220                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                
          an examiner’s rejection of claims 25, 28-33, and 36-40.  We                 
          reverse.                                                                    


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant’s invention relates to electronic books.                 
          Because texts of the Holy Bible are stored in a memory of the               
          appellant’s electronic book, his invention could be called an               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007