Appeal No. 1999-2257 Page 5
Application No. 08/767,220
(Examiner's Answer at 10.) He adds, “when the entry is a
state code or correlates to a state identifier it is processed
as a read request or static list.” (Id. at 7.) The appellant
argues, "neither Cassorla, et al. nor Cochran, et al.
discloses or suggests parsing a user entry by recognizing the
entry as a read mode request or as a search mode request
depending upon whether that user entry corresponds to any of
the section identifiers of the stored textual information."
(Appeal Br. at 10.)
Claims 25 and 29-31 specify in pertinent part the
following limitations: "parsing said user entry by recognizing
said user entry as a read mode request if said user entry
corresponds to any one of said section identifiers, and by
recognizing said user entry as a search mode request if said
user entry does not correspond to any one of said section
identifiers, displaying, when said user entry is recognized as
a read mode request, at least a portion of said section of
textual information having said section identifier to which
the user entry corresponds ....” Similarly, claim 28
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007