Appeal No. 1999-2257 Page 11
Application No. 08/767,220
any one of said section identifiers and said user entry is not
included within any of said sections of textual information,
and by recognizing said user entry as a search mode request if
said user entry does not correspond to any one of said section
identifiers, said parsing means including means for prompting
said user to indicate whether the user entry is a read mode
request or a search mode request when said user entry
corresponds to one of said section identifiers and said user
entry is included within at least one of said sections of
textual information; display means for displaying, when said
user entry is recognized as a read mode request, at least a
portion of said section of textual information having said
section identifier to which the user entry corresponds ....”
Therefore, we reverse the rejection of claims 25, 28-33, and
36-40 as being obvious over Cassorla in view of Cochran.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 25, 28-33, and 36-40
under § 103 is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007