Appeal No. 1999-2276
Application 08/785,802
each of said two erase track widths by said defined
distance;
said write/read head and said erase head being
constructed integrally with each other.
In rejecting Appellant’s claims, the Examiner relies on
Appellant’s admitted prior art (APA) and the following
reference:
Mori JP 3-173,908 Jul. 29,
1991
Claims 1 and 3-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being obvious over Appellant’s APA and Mori. Rather than
repeat the arguments of the Appellant and Examiner, we refer
the reader to the Appellant’s Brief and Examiner’s Answer for1 2
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
1Appellant filed an Appeal Brief (“Brief”) on February 8,
1999.
2The Examiner, in response to Appellant’s Brief, filed an
Examiner's Answer on March 15, 1999.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007