Appeal No. 1999-2398
Application No. 08/825,427
reversed because the applied references neither teach nor
would have suggested the specifically claimed execution of a
store operation.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through
5, 7 through 11, 13 through 28, 30 through 34, 36 through 46,
48 through 52 and 59 through 66 is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOSEPH L. DIXON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
KWH:hh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007