Appeal No. 1999-2555 Application No. 08/503,625 programmable to emulate avionics devices of the aircraft." Schefter (page 120) and Covault (page 50) state that computers which are exact duplicates of the computers which will be aboard the space shuttle are used. Therefore, the CPU and programmable input/output emulator, which are parts of those computers, must be duplicates of the hardware used on the space shuttle. The examiner, however, asserts (Answer, pages 4-5) that "it was notoriously old and well known in the art that full 'prime hardware incorporation' is not necessary for a simulator, i.e., that incorporation of an operative avionic subsystems [sic] is counterproductive to the desired cost benefit of simulation." Although we agree with the examiner that generally simulations of components are cheaper than the actual hardware, we find a lack of evidence in the record which would support the examiner's conclusion that it would have been obvious to use a software simulation within the computer for most, but not all, of the computer. In other words, in the face of the explicit teachings of Schefter and Covault to duplicate the entire computer, why would the skilled artisan have been motivated to duplicate only the operational flight 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007