Ex parte MICKELSON et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1999-2555                                                        
          Application No. 08/503,625                                                  


          program processor and simulate other components of the                      
          computer, as recited in claim 1?  The only motivation of                    
          record for doing so comes from appellants' disclosure of the                
          invention.  "Obviousness may not be established using                       
          hindsight or in view of the teachings or suggestions of the                 
          inventor."  Para-Ordnance Mfg., Inc. v. SGS Importers Int’l,                
          Inc., 73 F.3d 1085, 1087, 37 USPQ2d 1237, 1239 (Fed. Cir.                   
          1995), citing W.L. Gore & Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721               
          F.2d 1540, 1551, 1553, 220 USPQ 303, 311, 312-13 (Fed. Cir.                 
          1983).  Accordingly, we cannot sustain the rejection of claim               
          1 and its dependents, claims 4 through 7.                                   


















                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007