Appeal No. 1999-2607 Application 08/826,618 the personal character, that are also used in the shell."; col. 8, lines 17-21: "System services that are provided as part of the services 26 draw the speech balloon at the request of an application 28. The contents of the speech balloon (i.e., the text and controls contained therein) are the responsibility of the application."). Thus, even if some program interfaces take up the entire workspace as argued by Appellants (although this is not described by Linnett), at least some objects bring up two-dimensional user interfaces (the balloons associated with the personal characters) that do not take up the whole screen. For example, figure 3 shows the interface for a gardening application program with part of the room visible. However, we find no suggestion at the locations in Linnett noted by the Examiner, or elsewhere in Linnett, that the user can navigate away from the selected object in the three-dimensional workspace while the two-dimensional image remains active for user input. That is, while the three-dimensional workspace remains visible in back of the speech balloons and other parts of the two-dimensional interface (e.g., figure 3), there is no indication or suggestion that the user can navigate away while the application interface is open. Although the cellular telephone object described at column 13, lines 9-17, follows the - 7 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007