Appeal No. 1999-2607 Application 08/826,618 user around, there is no suggestion that the two-dimensional telephone interface, once opened, lets the user navigate away. Accordingly, we find that Linnett does not disclose "user interface means for navigating away from said selected virtual object within said three-dimensional workspace, and means for user interactive input to said displayed two-dimensional image, said input means remaining interactive after the user has navigated away from said selected virtual object," as recited in claim 20 and corresponding limitations in claims 21 and 22. Lynch does not cure the deficiencies of Linnett, as we will show. The Examiner's statement of the rejection does not rely on Lynch for anything more than a teaching of a "two-dimensional image of said virtual object," which limitation is not at issue. Nevertheless, some of the Examiner's remarks rely on Lynch and we discuss Lynch and the Examiner's remarks here. Appellants argue that Lynch relates to navigation in only a two-dimensional display interface having three distinct two-dimensional levels or layers and, thus, does not relate to navigation on a single level three-dimensional workspace (Br6-7). The Examiner states that the levels are part of one workspace, but, in any case, the room level constitutes a single workspace. - 8 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007