Appeal No. 1999-2607 Application 08/826,618 the "step back" function to return to the desktop, and (3) selects another object for display. The Examiner states that (FR9): "As a result, there can be a plurality of interfaces displayed on the screen, but which are not simultaneously visible to the user." The Examiner also states (EA8): "While the back function removes a selected two-dimensional image from the user's view, it does not deactivate or close the two-dimensional image and thus does not remove the two-dimensional image from display." Appellants respond that there is no support in Lynch for the Examiner's interpretation (Br8-10). We agree with Appellants that Lynch does not support the Examiner's scenario. Initially, the Examiner's finding (at EA8) that removing a selected two-dimensional image from the user's view does not remove the two-dimensional image from the display is not understood. A "displayed image" requires a visible image, not an image stored in a display, e.g., stored in the display memory. There is no suggestion in Lynch that a two-dimensional image corresponding to an object remains displayed during and after navigation. Lynch teaches that the two-dimensional application interfaces take up the whole display (e.g., figures 6-15 and 18). The only "navigation" that can be done from the user interface is to return to the level where the - 10 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007