SHIOKAWA et al. V. MAIENFISCH et al. - Page 58




                                Shiokawa fails to sufficiently explain why Maienfisch’s testing of eight of the compounds                                                              

                     specifically depicted in Table 1 of the ‘146 patent did not involve the “closest prior art.”  Specifically,                                                       

                     the ‘146 patent does not appear to indicate that a particular specific subgenus or species would possess                                                          

                     better or worse insecticidal properties than any other compound falling within the described genus of                                                             

                     insecticidal heterocyclic compounds.  Further, the ‘146 patent does not appear to indicate which of the                                                           

                     forty compounds specifically depicted in Table 1 of the ‘146 patent will possess better or worse                                                                  

                     insecticidal properties than any other depicted compounds.  Also, it does not appear that any of the                                                              

                     compounds specifically compared to Maienfisch’s S19 and S20 1,3,5-oxadiazines are explicitly                                                                      

                     mentioned in the ‘146 patent.  (See MX 1034, Table 13 and Table 14 and note that E is N-CH CH  in                                                                 
                                                                                                                                                            2     2                    
                     Table 13 and N-CH CH CH  in Table 14).  Moreover, Shiokawa has failed to sufficiently explain why                                                                 
                                                 2     2     2                                                                                                                         
                     one skilled in the art would be guided or directed to the analogs of S19 and S20 as representing the                                                              

                     “closest prior art.”  In contrast, the eight compounds identified by Mr. Rindlisbacher in Table 19 of his                                                         

                     declaration are specifically depicted in Table 1 of the ‘146 patent.  (SX 2003, Table 1, Compounds                                                                

                     numbered 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19 and 23).  It appears reasonable for one skilled in the art to select                                                          

                     the eight compounds identified in Table 19 of Mr. Rindlisbacher’s declaration as representative of the                                                            

                     closest prior art for Maienfisch’s claimed 1,3,5-oxadiazines.21                                                                                                   

                                We find Maienfisch’s evidence of unexpected results both credible and convincing.  Maienfisch                                                          

                     has sufficiently demonstrated that for the closest prior art the claimed 1,3,5-oxadiazine analogs                                                                 

                     generally provided, as a class, results that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have found                                                               



                                21As noted above, the examiner of Maienfisch’s parent ‘931 application directed Maienfisch                                                             
                     toward compound 23 of Shiokawa as representing the closest prior art.                                                                                             
                                                                                         56                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007