The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MINORU USUI, TAKAHIRO KATAKURA, FUJIO AKAHANE,
KAZUMI KAMOI, SATOSHI SHINADA, YUKIHISA TAKEUCHI,
and NOBUO TAKAHASHI
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0166
Application No. 07/809,042
____________
HEARD: February 5, 2002
____________
Before RUGGIERO, LALL, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3 which constitute all
the claims in the application.
The disclosed invention is directed to a piezo-
electric/electrostrictive film type chip including a ceramic
substrate having a spacer plate with a windows-disposed pattern
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007