Ex Parte HOFMEESTER et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2000-0265                                                                       
            Application No. 08/927,903                                                                 


                                            BACKGROUND                                                 
                  Appellants' invention relates to a paging receiver that displays visual symbols.     
            An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1,      
            which is reproduced below.                                                                 
                  1.    A handheld paging receiver comprising receiving means for                      
                  receiving messages and detecting symbol associated codes contained in                
                  the messages, selection means for selecting symbols corresponding to                 
                  the possible symbol associated codes in the messages from a                          
                  predetermined set of at least three visual symbols and for conveying said            
                  message using different selections of said symbols, and reproduction                 
                  means for visually reproducing as pictograms a plurality of the selected             
                  symbols corresponding to symbol associated codes in a received                       
                  message, wherein the reproduction means are arranged to visually                     
                  reproduce the symbols of the set of at least three visual symbols as                 
                  respective different pictograms in predesignated positions such that each            
                  different pictogram has its own exclusive predesignated position and the             
                  pictograms are situated relative to one another so as to form a                      
                  two-dimensional scene.                                                               

                  The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the      
            appealed claims are:                                                                       
            Oshikawa                      5,273,475                     Dec. 28, 1993                  
            Reed et al. (Reed)            WO-91/03885                   Mar. 21, 1991                  

                  Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Reed.          
            Claims 3, 4, 7, and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by Reed or in    
            the alternative under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Reed.  Claims 5 and       


                                                  2                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007