Ex Parte CAMIS et al - Page 1





           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 17         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                                Ex parte THOMAS CAMIS,                                
                              C.S. CHAN, and GARY HANSON                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-0335                                 
                              Application No. 08/780,551                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the            
          examiner's final rejection1 of claims 1, 3-7, 9-11, and 13-26,              
          which are all of the claims pending in this application.                    





               1 An amendment (Paper No. 10, filed October 26, 1998) submitted        
          subsequent to the final rejection has been denied entry by the examiner (Paper
          No. 11, mailed January 6, 1999).                                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007