The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS CAMIS, C.S. CHAN, and GARY HANSON ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0335 Application No. 08/780,551 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection1 of claims 1, 3-7, 9-11, and 13-26, which are all of the claims pending in this application. 1 An amendment (Paper No. 10, filed October 26, 1998) submitted subsequent to the final rejection has been denied entry by the examiner (Paper No. 11, mailed January 6, 1999).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007