Appeal No. 2000-0335 Application No. 08/780,551 Page 8 members 2 and the signal electrodes 1 are continuously widened to prevent toner from contacting the inner wall of the openings 4. In figure 5C, (col. 6, lines 36-40) the diameter of the insulating members 2 and the signal electrodes 1 are large relative to the diameter of the base electrodes 3. In both figures 5B and 5C, the enlarged openings are for the purpose of preventing the openings from being clogged by toner. From the disclosure of Fujii, we agree with appellants that Fujii does not disclose that the second electrode spans the orifice in the third electrode, because although the holes forming the orifices extend through the base electrode 3, the signal electrode 1, and the insulating members 2, the second electrode continuously spans distances between the holes and does not span the holes themselves. We are not persuaded by the examiner's assertions that the electrodes 3 in figure 5C of Fujii span the orifice 4. From the dictionary definition provided by the examiner, it is clear that to span the orifice, the electrode would have to extend, reach, or spread between two limits, i.e., across the orifice in the third electrode, which the electrode 3 does not do, as electrode 3 provides an open circular area in the center, through which the orifice extends. We find that in figure 5C, electrode 3 partially spans the orifice 4, but doesPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007