The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HITOSHI HAYAMA, KENJI WATANABE, TAKANOBU KAMEDA, and TOMOYUKI SHIMMURA ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0359 Application No. 08/777,393 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL The examiner rejected claims 1 and 12. The appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We affirm. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal generally relates to laying out characters in a defined area, e.g., for the printing surface of a label. Conventional character layout used in word processors, for example, employs a uniformPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007