Ex parte HAYAMA et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2000-0359                                       Page 4           
          Application No. 08/777,393                                                  


          width MW’, ‘defined printing length SL’, ‘actually printable                
          length JL’, ‘printable dot column count ND’, ‘margin space                  
          YS’, ‘character spacing MN’, etc."  (Examiner's Answer at 7.)               
          The appellants argue, "the reference simply does not disclose               
          or suggest satisfying B>D>0, where D is the dimension of a                  
          margin between an edge of the contour or frame and a character              
          at an end of said string, and B is the dimension of an inter-               
          character spacing between adjacent characters."  (Appeal Br.                
          at 4.)                                                                      


               In deciding anticipation, “the first inquiry must be into              
          exactly what the claims define.”  In re Wilder, 429 F2d 447,                
          450, 166 USPQ 545, 548 (CCPA 1970).  Here, claims 1 and 12                  
          specify laying out the characters of a character string "so as              
          to satisfy B>D>0, where D is the dimension of a margin between              
          an edge of said frame and a character at an end of said                     
          string, and B is the dimension of an inter-character spacing                
          between adjacent characters. . . ."  Accordingly, the claims                
          require inter alia laying out characters of a character string              










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007