Ex parte BLAUM et al. - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2000-0380                                                                                    
             Application No. 08/816,648                                                                              

             uncoded binary data on a magnetic recording medium to enhance timing recovery.                          
                    Independent claim 25 is reproduced as follows:                                                   
                    25.     A method for storing input groups of uncoded binary data on a                            
                    magnetic recording medium to enhance timing recovery, each said group                            
                    comprising a sequence of uncoded binary data, wherein the method                                 
                    comprises the steps of:                                                                          
                    encoding each input group using an m/n rate block coded sequence and                             
                    impressing a predetermined bit pattern thereon to provide corresponding                          
                    output groups of encoded binary data; and                                                        
                    storing the output groups on the magnetic recording medium.                                      
                    The sole reference relied on by the Examiner is as follows:                                      
                    Knudson                            5,521,945                  May 28, 1996                       
                    Claims 25 through 28 and 44 through 47 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as                   
             being anticipated by Knudson.                                                                           
                    Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants and the Examiner, we make                         
                                    1                                                                                
             reference to the briefs  and the answer for the details thereof.                                        
                                                     OPINION                                                         

                    After a careful review of the evidence before us, we do not agree with the Examiner              
             that claims 25 through 28 and 44 through 47 are anticipated by Knudson.                                 
                    It is axiomatic that anticipation of a claim under §102 can be found only if the prior           


                    1Appellants filed an appeal brief on May 3, 1999.  Appellants filed a reply brief on July 7, 1999.
             The Examiner mailed an office communication on July 22, 1999 stating that the reply brief had been entered
             and considered.                                                                                         
                                                         2                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007