Ex Parte MIZUNO et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                            Paper No. 29              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                    Ex parte HIROYUKI MIZUNO, TAKAHIRO NAGANO and                     
                                 YOSHINOBU NAKAGOME                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2000-0452                                  
                             Application No. 08/622,389                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before HAIRSTON, LEVY, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges               
          LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the            
          Examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3 to 18 and 221, all the            
          pending claims in the application.                                          





               1 Both the examiner and the appellants have stated that claims 1 and 3 
          through 22 are on appeal.  However, due to the entry of an amendment filed on
          October 19, 1999 (paper no. 27) and its entry on November 29, 1999 (paper no.
          28), claims 19 through 21 have been canceled.  Therefore, only claims 1, 3 to
          18 and 22 are pending in this application.                                  
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007