Ex Parte BROBERG - Page 9


                   Appeal No. 2000-0545                                                                                            
                   Application 08/638,339                                                                                          


                          Appellant has not made any other arguments.  37 CFR § 1.192 (a) states:                                  
                          Appellant must, within two months from the date of the notice of appeal under §                          
                          1.191 or within the time allowed for reply to the action from which the appeal was                       
                          taken, if such time is later, file a brief in triplicate.  The brief must be                             
                          accompanied by the fee set forth in § 1.17 (c) and must set forth the authorities                        
                          and arguments on which appellant will rely to maintain the appeal.  Any                                  
                          arguments or authorities not included in the brief will be refused consideration by                      
                          the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, unless good cause is shown.                               
                   Thus, 37 CFR § 1.192 provides that only the arguments made by Appellant in the brief                            
                   will be considered and that failure to make an argument constitutes a waiver on that                            
                   particular point.  Support for this rule has been demonstrated by our reviewing court in In                     
                   re Berger, 279 F.3d 975, 61 USPQ2d 1523 (Fed. Cir. 2002), wherein the Federal Circuit                           
                   Court stated that because Appellant did not contest the merits of the rejections in his brief                   
                   to the Federal Circuit court, the issue is waived.                                                              
                          We find that Appellant’s claim 1 is properly rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  In                         
                   view of the foregoing, we will sustain the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1                          
                   through 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  Accordingly, the decision of the Examiner is                                 
                   affirmed.                                                                                                       















                                                                9                                                                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007