The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOACHIM GANTE,
HORST JURASZYK,
PETER RADDATZ,
HANNS WURZIGER,
SABINE BERNOTAT-DANIELOWSKI, and
GUIDO MELZER
__________
Appeal No. 2000-0600
Application No. 08/642,268
__________
ON BRIEF1
__________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ADAMS, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1, 2, 5-11, and 13-19. The examiner has indicated that
claim 3, the only other pending claim, is allowed. See Final Office Action, page 3.
1 We recognize appellants’ request for an oral hearing (Paper No. 23, received June 23, 1999).
However, in accordance with 37 CFR §1.194(c), the Board decided that an oral hearing was not
necessary in this appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007