Ex Parte WONG - Page 9



          Appeal No. 2000-0751                                                         
          Application No. 08/903,549                                                   

               Thus, since we have not sustained the rejections of claims              
          27 and 30 under 35 U.S.C. 102 and we have not sustained the                  
          rejections of claims 1-10, 12-26 and 29 under 35 U.S.C. 103, but             
          we have sustained the rejection of claim 11 under 35 U.S.C.                  
          102(e), the examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part.                         
               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                      
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                     
          § 1.136(a).                                                                  
                                   AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                    




                         KENNETH W. HAIRSTON            )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                         ERROL A. KRASS                 ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )   APPEALS AND                
                                                        )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                         JERRY SMITH                    )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              
                                                        )                              



                                         -9–                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007