Ex parte ESTEP et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-0965                                                        
          Application No. 08/927,465                                                  


               memory communicating with the CPU to store digitized                   
               measurements, and a port to allow downloading of                       
               digitized measurements stored in the memory for the                    
               purpose of further analysis at a remote location;                      
                    a test probe connected to said system unit and                    
               connectable to an electrical test point for making an                  
               electrical signal measurement, the CPU digitizing a                    
               measured electrical signal and formatting the digitized                
               signal for display and storing in the memory; and                      
                    an integrated visual display and an audio link to                 
               the system unit, the audio link generating electrical                  
               signals in response to spoken commands by the technician,              
               which spoken commands are recognized by the speech                     
               recognition software running on the CPU and associated                 
               circuitry to direct and navigate through a displayed user              
               interface in order to operate electrical signal                        
               measurement device functions, including storing digitized              
               measurements in memory, and the CPU providing user                     
               feedback and messages whereby all measurements may be                  
               made in a hands free manner.                                           
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Janik                         5,581,492                Dec. 03,             
                                                                 1996                 
          Fournier et al. (Fournier)    5,671,158                Sep. 23,             
                                                                 1997                 
                                                  (filed Sep. 18,                     
          1995)                                                                       
               Claims 1, 4-11, and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 103 as being unpatentable over the combined teachings of                  
          Fournier and Janik.                                                         
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the              



                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007