Appeal No. 2000-0965
Application No. 08/927,465
Accordingly, since we are of the opinion that the prior
art applied by the Examiner does not support the obviousness
rejection, we do not sustain the rejection of independent
claim 1, nor of claims 4-11 and 17 dependent thereon.
Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1, 4-
11, and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007